Skip to content

1968 Fair Housing Act Interpretation by Justices

July 14, 2015

Author: Lucas LaChance, CPA, CIA and Director of Practice Growth at LGT

Among a flurry of opinions issued recently by the Supreme Court as they closed out their judiciary session on June 30th was a split decision on a broad interpretation of the Fair Housing Act of 1968.

In a 5-4 decision penned by frequent swing vote Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court allowed for plaintiffs suing under the housing law to only prove “disparate impact” rather than the more stringent standard of intentional discrimination. Disparate impact is frequently demonstrated through the use of statistics, which are fairly easy to obtain, while proving intentional discrimination is significantly more difficult given that agencies and businesses rarely document blatant discrimination in their records.

Justice Kennedy was joined by the four more liberal-leaning members of the Court—Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan. The original suit has Texas roots and was first filed by the Inclusive Communities Project against the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs. The Inclusive Communities Project is a Dallas-based organization that helps low-income black families find affordable housing in Dallas suburbs, which are primarily white.

The services of a legal or tax advisor should be sought before implementing any ideas contained in this blog. To reach a financial advisor at Lane Gorman Trubitt, PLLC, call 214.871.7500 or email at


From → Accounting Tips

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: